engqert.blogg.se

And, yes, it can be used to review deposition transcripts as well. This approach is simple, quick and gets the job done with a minimal of effort. Double clicking the image opens it in Preview where you can annotate/mark-up/add notes if you desire. When conducting document review with MacJournal, it goes like this: (1) With a document open in Preview, hit Command-c when you come across a choice page (2) switch to MacJournal and create a new entry, date it, add tags and, in the main body jott a few notes (3) hit Command-v and the page is dropped into MacJournal for later reference/review. must create a ‘smart folder’ to accomplish, still not a deal killer proprietary file format and structure, but considering responsiveness and longevity of MacJournal/Mariner, still not a deal killer. Questions, comments and concerns often get a personal response.Ĭons: PDF/attachment handling is done ‘inline,’ kind of ugly, but not a deal killer No ‘filter’ option for doing a quick filter of entries based on Tag, Annotation, Date, or Content, i.e.  MacJournal has an excellent developer (Dan Schimpf answers questions and listens to user input – check his blog).  Additionally, this offers the opportunity to keep one journal as your ‘attorney’s daybook’ where you drop all the tidbits that accumulate. You can save a journal as a ‘document’ into Dropbox for each client-matter. Pros: Can save individual documents, making client-matter project management easier. Initially, MacJournal lacked the ability to change the date of each entry, making it impossible to use for case analysis chronology.  Caveat, MacJournal will not pull over images or any metadata other than tags. Now, because of its ability to import Journler data, complete with tags, MacJournal finds itself doing heavy lifting on case analysis. When hunting around for a ‘Casemap’ replacement a few years back, MacJournal entered onto the final list.